ACTIVITY SCOPE | COLLABORATION TYPE | AID TYPE | FINANCE TYPE | FLOW TYPE | TIED STATUS | HIERARCHY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bilateral 1 |
Project-type interventions C01
|
Standard grant 110 | ODA 10 | 2 |
PARTICIPATING ORG | REFERENCE | ROLE | TYPE |
---|---|---|---|
Institute for Human Rights and Business
|
CRS Other
|
Accountable | Foundation |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark
|
REF XM-DAC-3-1
|
Funding | Government |
DESCRIPTION | CODE | VOCABULARY |
---|---|---|
Promote development-oriented policies that support productive activities, decent job creation, entrepreneurship, creativity and innovation, and encourage the formalization and growth of micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises, including through access to financial services | 8.3 | UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Targets |
Promote development-oriented policies that support productive activities, decent job creation, entrepreneurship, creativity and innovation, and encourage the formalization and growth of micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises, including through access to financial services | 8.3 | UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Targets |
CODELIST | SIGNIFICANCE | VOCABULARY | DESCRIPTION |
---|---|---|---|
Aid Targeting the Objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity | not targeted | OECD DAC CRS | The score "not targeted" means that the activity was examined but found not to target the policy objective. |
Aid Targeting the Objectives of the Convention to Combat Desertification | not targeted | OECD DAC CRS | The score "not targeted" means that the activity was examined but found not to target the policy objective. |
Aid Targeting the Objectives of the Framework Convention on Climate Change - Adaptation | not targeted | OECD DAC CRS | The score "not targeted" means that the activity was examined but found not to target the policy objective. |
Aid Targeting the Objectives of the Framework Convention on Climate Change - Mitigation | not targeted | OECD DAC CRS | The score "not targeted" means that the activity was examined but found not to target the policy objective. |
Aid to Environment | not targeted | OECD DAC CRS | The score "not targeted" means that the activity was examined but found not to target the policy objective. |
Disability | not targeted | OECD DAC CRS | The score "not targeted" means that the activity was examined but found not to target the policy objective. |
Disaster Risk Reduction(DRR) | not targeted | OECD DAC CRS | The score "not targeted" means that the activity was examined but found not to target the policy objective. |
Gender Equality | significant objective | OECD DAC CRS | Significant (secondary) policy objectives are those which, although important, were not the prime motivation for undertaking the activity. |
Nutrition | not targeted | OECD DAC CRS | The score "not targeted" means that the activity was examined but found not to target the policy objective. |
Participatory Development/Good Governance | not targeted | OECD DAC CRS | The score "not targeted" means that the activity was examined but found not to target the policy objective. |
Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (RMNCH) | not targeted | OECD DAC CRS | The score "not targeted" means that the activity was examined but found not to target the policy objective. |
Trade Development | not targeted | OECD DAC CRS | The score "not targeted" means that the activity was examined but found not to target the policy objective. |
START | END | TYPE | STATUS | VALUE |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-10-01 | 2019-12-31 | Original | 1,500,000 DKK |
|
2021-10-01 | 2021-12-31 | Original | 1,000,000 DKK |
DATE | DESCRIPTION | PROVIDER | RECEIVER | VALUE |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-10-28 |
FLOW ODA
10
FINANCE Standard grant 110
STATUS Untied 5
|
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark
REF XM-DAC-3-1
|
Institute for Human Rights and Business
Foundation
|
2,500,000 DKK |
DATE | DESCRIPTION | PROVIDER | RECEIVER | VALUE |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-11-27 |
FLOW ODA
10
FINANCE Standard grant 110
STATUS Untied 5
|
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark
REF XM-DAC-3-1
|
Institute for Human Rights and Business
Foundation
|
1,500,000 DKK |
2021-11-24 |
FLOW ODA
10
FINANCE Standard grant 110
STATUS Untied 5
|
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark
REF XM-DAC-3-1
|
Institute for Human Rights and Business
Foundation
|
1,000,000 DKK |
FACET | BASELINE | TARGET | ACTUAL | % | PERIOD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit | Unit | ||||
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
Myanmar National Human Rights Commission (MNHRC), Environmental Conservation Department (ECD), Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) taking steps towards establishing monitoring and grievance mechanisms that are UNGP compliant and effective | Preparatory works - 2 trainings to Myanmar National Human Rights Commission (MNHRC) on business and human rights. Ongoing support to environmental Conservation Department (ECD) on inclusion of regulatory requirement on effective operational grievance mechanisms (OGM) in Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) and guidelines, including monitoring of complaints in 6 month reports. | N/A |
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31 |
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
Three examples of MNHRC, ECD, DICA taking steps towards establishing monitoring and grievance mechanisms that are UNGP compliant and effective. | 1 ongoing government initiative with Environmental Conservation Department (ECD). | N/A |
2020-01-01 : 2020-12-31 |
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
Three examples of MNHRC, ECD, DICA taking steps towards establishing monitoring and grievance mechanisms that are UNGP compliant and effective. | None | N/A |
2021-01-01 : 2021-12-31 |
FACET | BASELINE | TARGET | ACTUAL | % | PERIOD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit | Unit | ||||
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
More significant Myanmar companies adopted human rights policies. CSV (Creating Shared Value) examples were documented. Peer-to-peer meetings or bilateral meetings were organised. New companies participated in workshops where MCRB spoke on responsible business conduct (RBC). Collective actions taken by business organised or influenced by MCRB. | Preparation works - publishing updated Country Guide on Business and Human Rights, organising Steering Committee meetings for raising business awareness of the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPSHR), Publishing pwint thit sa reports, and organising workshops on ‘inclusive business focusing on people with disability, LGBT | N/A |
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31 |
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
• 5 more significant Myanmar companies adopt human rights policies • 5 CSV examples are documented • 3 peer-to-peer meetings p.a. • 100 bilateral meetings or substantive email responses p.a. • 100 new companies p.a. participate in workshops where MCRB speaks on RBC • 2 collective actions p.a. by business organised or influenced by MCRB | 35 mention human rights but only 2 can be considered adequate. 3 CSV examples were documented in 2020. 4 peer-to-peer meetings were held. Over 120 bilateral meetings/ substantive emails. 44 new companies participated in workshops where MCRB spoke on RBC. There were 2 collective actions by business organised or influenced by MCRB. | N/A |
2020-01-01 : 2020-12-31 |
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
• 5 more significant Myanmar companies adopt human rights policies • 5 CSV examples are documented • 3 peer-to-peer meetings p.a. • 100 bilateral meetings or substantive email responses p.a. • 100 new companies p.a. participate in workshops where MCRB speaks on RBC • 2 collective actions p.a. by business organised or influenced by MCRB | No survey in 2021 1 CSV example documented. 7 peer-to-peer meetings. At least 146 companies engaged with in bilateral meetings or substantive emails, some of them on several occasions. | N/A |
2021-01-01 : 2021-12-31 |
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
• 5 more significant Myanmar companies adopt human rights policies • 5 CSV examples are documented • 3 peer-to-peer meetings p.a. • 100 bilateral meetings or substantive email responses p.a. • 100 new companies p.a. participate in workshops where MCRB speaks on RBC • 2 collective actions p.a. by business organised or influenced by MCRB | N/A | N/A |
2022-01-01 : 2022-12-31 |
FACET | BASELINE | TARGET | ACTUAL | % | PERIOD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit | Unit | ||||
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
2 | 2 |
100%
|
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31 |
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
4 | 4 |
100%
|
2020-01-01 : 2020-12-31 |
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
3 | 3 |
100%
|
2021-01-01 : 2021-12-31 |
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
3 | N/A | N/A |
2022-01-01 : 2022-12-31 |
FACET | BASELINE | TARGET | ACTUAL | % | PERIOD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit | Unit | ||||
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
5 MCRB's written/oral submissions to government/parliament on specific policy/legal reform. 3 CSO or business submissions supported by MCRB. 2 training events on responsible business conduct (RBC) topics for Union, Regional and State governments. | 7 MCRB's written/oral submissions to government/parliament on specific policy/legal reform. 2 training events related to Investment and responsible business conduct (RBC) and good practice and regulation on donations and philanthropy |
100%
|
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31 |
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
5 MCRB's written/oral submissions to government/parliament on specific policy/legal reform. 3 CSO or business submissions supported by MCRB. 2 training events on responsible business conduct (RBC) topics for Union, Regional and State governments. | 7 written and 8 oral submissions to government/parliament on specific policy/legal reform. 8 CSO or business submissions supported by MCRB. 2 training events on responsible business conduct (RBC) topics for Union, Regional and State governments. |
100%
|
2020-01-01 : 2020-12-31 |
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
5 MCRB's written/oral submissions to government/parliament on specific policy/legal reform. 3 CSO or business submissions supported by MCRB. 2 training events on responsible business conduct (RBC) topics for Union, Regional and State governments. | 4 MCRB written/oral submissions to government/parliament on specific policy/legal reform. 1 CSO or business submissions supported by MCRB. No events. |
80%
|
2021-01-01 : 2021-12-31 |
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
5 MCRB's written/oral submissions to government/parliament on specific policy/legal reform. 3 CSO or business submissions supported by MCRB. 2 training events on responsible business conduct (RBC) topics for Union, Regional and State governments. | N/A | N/A |
2022-01-01 : 2022-12-31 |
FACET | BASELINE | TARGET | ACTUAL | % | PERIOD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit | Unit | ||||
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
• MCRB facilitated a joint statement in January 2022 on the impacts of the Cybersecurity draft law • MCRB’s two submissions to the OHCHR on the Practical Application of the UNGPs to the Tech Sector; and on the Right to Privacy in the Digital Age summarized current challenges on issues such as data protection, biometrics, SIM Card registration and e-ID, and brought the regulatory problems into the public domain. • MCRB supported NGOs to engage with major Myanmar banks to jointly identify advocacy to the Central Bank concerning NGO banking; but, the operating environment for NGOs had worsened by the adoption of the revised Associations Law in 2022. • MCRB drafted an advocacy paper jointly by international chambers to highlight the actions which the military government needed to take rapidly to avoid being placed on the FATF blacklist. However, Myanmar was placed on the blacklist in October 2022. | N/A | N/A |
2022-01-01 : 2022-12-31 |
FACET | BASELINE | TARGET | ACTUAL | % | PERIOD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit | Unit | ||||
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
- Myanmar/ international businesses including Asian see MCRB as trusted source of up-to-date information on responsible business conduct (RBC) practice, use MCRB's publications and act on MCRB recommendations. - More businesses undertake and publish summaries of their heightened human rights due diligence, including how they are addressing risks of operating in conflict affected areas. - Myanmar companies take steps to improve corporate disclosure, thereby improving corporate governance. | N/A | N/A |
2021-01-01 : 2021-12-31 |
FACET | BASELINE | TARGET | ACTUAL | % | PERIOD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit | Unit | ||||
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
Year Result June 2022 • At least 82 companies engaged with in bilateral meetings - 28 new; 21 Myanmar; 9 Asians. • 3 publications - 1) Jan 2022 Garment Factsheet (with EuroCham) to support heightened human rights due diligence: 2) Private Security Company baseline assessment/recommendations: 3) Update (February) on cybersecurity law and risks • 31 business-focussed events of which 7 targeted Asian companies and 9 targeted Myanmar companies. 3 meetings of disability-led/focussed SMEs with approx. 30 participants for each meeting. • 2 active partnerships, with Myanmar Business Coalition on Gender Equality, and Myanmar Institute for Directors. MCRB material and trainers included in activities of both. • MCRB taught on 5 MIOD courses, with around 150 participants in total from over 30 companies. • disability inclusion at 1 BCGE event, 39 participants, and collaborated with them on LGBT+/Fly the Flag • Assessment on 271 companies • MCRB Advisory Group met 2 times in 2022 | N/A | N/A |
2022-01-01 : 2022-12-31 |
FACET | BASELINE | TARGET | ACTUAL | % | PERIOD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit | Unit | ||||
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
• 1 CSO networking on business impact in their regions (28 July) Myanmar Digital Rights Forum partners convened 24 Feb for update 2 meetings of labour groups and trade unions. • 1:1 discussions with individual TUs and LROs. Made connections between them and brands on specific issues including LIDL, Bestseller TUs/LROs participated in 1 discussion with brands. • Had separate 1:1 discussion with WoVo/Labor Solutions and ulula on their stakeholder engagement/grievance apps in use in the garment sector Grievance handling was an agenda item in the 27 June bipartite dialogue with garment brands (27 June) part of 1:1 discussions with several garment brands • MCRB discussed OGM with Myanmar Survey Research on Kyaukphyu port EIA and with local CSO Centre for Peace and Development | N/A | N/A |
2022-01-01 : 2022-12-31 |
FACET | BASELINE | TARGET | ACTUAL | % | PERIOD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit | Unit | ||||
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
State based non-judicial mechanisms compatible with UNGPs are being adopted. Company-level grievance mechanisms compatible with UNGPs are being used. Businesses are interested in/are putting Operational Grievance Mechanism (OGM) in place. | During 2020, ECD (Environmental Conservation Department) continued to issue Environmental Compliance Certificates requiring projects to have an OGM (Operational Grievance Mechanism) complaint with Article 31 of the UNGPs. MCRB continued to present the MPRL OGM as an example of best practice in training on OGMs. In 2021, the work with government was paused from 1 February onwards. MCRB had not been able to determine. There were no example documented in 2021, although the risks associated with grievance mechanisms, and company practices on rights-holder engagement were discussed in MCRB's work on heightened due diligence and advice to companies, particularly in the garment sector. In 2021, two CSO networking discussions were organized to support the civil society to engage with business Capacity-building and networking for civil society groups on issues relevant to business/investment. Grievance handling was discussed with some garment brands. | N/A |
2020-01-01 : 2020-12-31 |
FACET | BASELINE | TARGET | ACTUAL | % | PERIOD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit | Unit | ||||
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
|
Not provided
|
• Government undertakes consultation or public-private dialogue, with MCRB input • MCRB advice requested and/or taken up including in laws, rules, guidelines etc • Other organisations seek to work with MCRB on advocacy | -MCRB submitted 19 written/oral submissions to government/parliament on specific policy/legal reform. (Target 5 per annum) -MCRB supported 9 CSO or business submissions. (Target 3 per annum) -MCRB organized 2 training events on responsible business conduct (RBC) topics for Union, Regional and State governments. (Target: 2 per annum) - There were 5 actions by government and development partners on MCRB's recommendations made in policy/law consultations and other ad hoc inputs. (Target: 1 per annum) - There was one collaborative initiative with collaborative initiative with state actor in 2020, but there was no more collaborative initiatives with state actors in 2021 because MCRB had to cease the engagement with the defacto government after 1 Feb 2021. | N/A |
2021-01-01 : 2021-12-31 |
REFERENCE IDENTIFIER | OWNER ORG IDENTIFIER | TYPE | DESCRIPTION |
---|---|---|---|
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark |
2019 - 35751 |
Reporting Organisation's internal activity identifier
CODE A1
|
No description provided |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark |
2019001164 |
CRS Activity identifier
CODE A2
|
No description provided |