ACTIVITY TITLE
IDH Tea program
Reported by
IDH, the Sustainable Trade Initiative NL-KVK-53521129 International NGO
ACTIVITY SCOPE COLLABORATION TYPE AID TYPE FINANCE TYPE FLOW TYPE TIED STATUS HIERARCHY
Project-type interventions C01
Standard grant 110 Private Development Finance 30 Untied 1
Planned start date 2016-01-01
Planned end date 2020-12-31
activity status: Implementation
The activity is currently being implemented
WHO'S INVOLVED ( 3 )
PARTICIPATING ORG REFERENCE ROLE TYPE
IDH, the Sustainable Trade Initiative
Funding International NGO
IDH, the Sustainable Trade Initiative
Accountable International NGO
IDH, the Sustainable Trade Initiative
Implementing International NGO
General
The IDH Tea program brings together the largest tea packers and the most important NGOs in the tea sector. The program promotes sustainable tea production in Africa and Asia, and sustainable procurement in NW Europe and Asia. It has first-hand experience in up scaling of certification training and farmer field school (FFS) extension. The Tea program is strongly committed to working toward living wages in key tea-exporting countries. Other interventions are in the area of agro-chemical use and gender. Since the start in 2008, IDH has invested in strategic relationships with a wide range of key tea players in Europe, Africa and Asia. After the successes in Kenya with farmer field schools in Kenya and Tanzania, the program is now moving towards harvesting the sector’s ‘higher-hanging fruits’: the impact that potentially can be made but has not yet. The impact of the Tea program is concentrated in Malawi, Tanzania, Kenya, India, and Vietnam. Across these geographical areas, issues that beg solutions vary widely. The Tea program implements a range of intervention logics, or problem-solving approaches, that propose solutions considerate of their context.
policy marker( 2 )
CODELIST SIGNIFICANCE VOCABULARY DESCRIPTION
Aid to Environment significant objective OECD DAC CRS Significant (secondary) policy objectives are those which, although important, were not the prime motivation for undertaking the activity.
Trade Development significant objective OECD DAC CRS Significant (secondary) policy objectives are those which, although important, were not the prime motivation for undertaking the activity.
recipient country ( 5 )
MalawiMW
30
IndiaIN
20
KenyaKE
20
Tanzania, the United Republic ofTZ
20
RwandaRW
10
sector ( 1 )
OECD DAC CRS 5 digit1( 1 )
The sector reported corresponds to an OECD DAC CRS 5-digit purpose code http://reference.iatistandard.org/codelists/Sector/
Agricultural development31120
100
GLOSSARY
Agricultural developmentIntegrated projects; farm development.
Financial Overview
Incoming Commitment ( 7 )
Expenditure ( 5 )
Budget ( 5 )
Incoming Commitment
Expenditure
Budget
Budget ( 5 )
START END TYPE STATUS VALUE
2016-01-01 2016-12-31 Original Committed 2,200,000
EUR
2017-01-01 2017-12-31 Original Committed 1,800,000
EUR
2018-01-01 2018-12-31 Original Committed 2,000,000
EUR
2019-01-01 2019-12-31 Original Committed 2,000,000
EUR
2020-01-01 2020-12-31 Original Committed 2,700,000
EUR
Budget
Transactions ( 12 )
Incoming Commitment ( 7 )
DATE DESCRIPTION PROVIDER RECEIVER VALUE
2016-01-01
REF Incoming Commitment 2016 from Core funding
International NGO
International NGO
1,592,628
EUR
2016-01-01
REF Incoming Commitment 2016 from Other funding
International NGO
International NGO
2,160
EUR
2016-01-01
REF Incoming Commitment 2016 from private funding
International NGO
60,000
EUR
2017-01-01
REF Incoming Commitment 2017 from Core funding
International NGO
International NGO
2,350,000
EUR
2018-01-01
REF Incoming Commitment 2018 from Core funding
International NGO
International NGO
2,000,000
EUR
2019-01-01
REF Incoming Commitment 2019 from Core funding
International NGO
International NGO
2,000,000
EUR
2020-01-01
REF Incoming Commitment 2020 from Core funding
International NGO
International NGO
2,700,000
EUR
Incoming Commitment
Expenditure ( 5 )
DATE DESCRIPTION PROVIDER RECEIVER VALUE
2016-12-31
The program expenditure refers to: the payables to Implementing Partners for program implementation costs (IDH enters multi-year agreements with private and other implementing partners to execute the implementation of program activities in the field) and the IDH internal expenditures in the program development. Due to confidential agreements with some of the implementing partners, IDH reserves the right to publish organizations names, data and other relevant information. Aggregated results will be published on an aggregated commodity/landscape program level.
REF Tea Expenditure 2016
International NGO
Public and private organizations and partners associated with IDH through signed contracts and agreements for the development and implementation of specific activities and projects in the program sectors that IDH operates in.
1,654,788
EUR
2017-12-31
REF Tea Expenditure 2017
International NGO
2,350,000
EUR
2018-12-31
REF Tea Expenditure 2018
International NGO
Public and private organizations and partners associated with IDH through signed contracts and agreements for the development and implementation of specific activities and projects in the program sectors that IDH operates in.
International NGO
2,059,361
EUR
2019-12-31
REF Tea Expenditure 2019
International NGO
Public and private organizations and partners associated with IDH through signed contracts and agreements for the development and implementation of specific activities and projects in the program sectors that IDH operates in.
International NGO
2,219,517
EUR
2020-12-31
REF Tea Expenditure 2020
International NGO
Public and private organizations and partners associated with IDH through signed contracts and agreements for the development and implementation of specific activities and projects in the program sectors that IDH operates in.
International NGO
2,113,276
EUR
Expenditure
result( 3 )
outcome( 3 )
GLOSSARY
OutcomeResults of the activity that produce an effect on the overall communities or issues you serve. For example lower rate of infection after a vaccination programme.
Outcome
indicator( 5 )
Result Area 1 - Change in business practice
INDICATOR
Business cases developed within the IDH program to show the potential of sustainable practices
The number and description of business cases that have been developed within the IDH program to demonstrate to the private sector the potential of sustainable practices adopted and implemented by other organizations.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Qualitative Qualitative
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
Not provided
3 3
100%
2017-01-01 : 2017-12-31
Actual comment
1. India – RAM / Empowerment; 2. Kenya – Gender equality & empowerment; 3. Malawi – Living Wage & Working Conditions
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
Not provided
Not provided
5
N/A
2018-01-01 : 2018-12-31
Actual comment
1. Roadmap to address gender-based violence (GBV) in the Kenyan tea sector: together with its partners, IDH has created a roadmap to address GBV and other forms of sexual harassment in the Kenyan tea industry. IDH gathered input for the roadmap through partner visits, and sought a partnership with UN Women for technical validation. This roadmap is a practical guide for estate management, and can influence individual companies’ business practices and create field-level results through implementation of policies and reporting mechanisms. The roadmap is scalable to other tea-producing countries, such as Malawi, where an interest for the development of such a document has been expressed.2. Sustainable procurement model for Malawi Tea 2020: in 2018, the sustainable procurement model was put into use for the first time since its development, and has been revised since initial user feedback. IDH has been involved in the development of this innovative tool, and provided funding for it. The model enables companies to quantify what they need to do in order to bridge the living wage gap by a certain percentage, creating the business case for sustainable procurement. The model is replicable to other sectors and countries after some changes in its required data, which will be finalized in 2019. 3. Financial literacy with a gender lens for the Kenyan tea industry: together with BSR, IDH has published a study on including a gender lens in financial literacy programs for companies. This publication, based on research by BSR in the Kenyan tea and flowers sectors, provides a business case by proving why gender lens investing is necessary for companies. IDH brought in the connection to addressing GBV, based on its core work in Kenya. The outcomes of the publication are replicable to any financial literacy program.4. SDM study for Rwanda TWFA: IDH carried out an SDM study on its project with The Wood Foundation Africa (TWFA) in Rwanda, which provided an analysis of the end results of the project, which ended in 2018. This analysis provides insights into the SDM of the Foundation, as well as the broader business case for investing in this model by all partners involved. 5. SDM study for Tanzania UTT: IDH carried out an SDM study on its project with Unilever Tea Tanzania. The report proves the business case for the approach that has been taken by the partners, highlighting that a quality bonus payment system increases farmer loyalty. This is a finding that can be easily replicated to other tea initiatives and sector programs. The report is also a business case for companies to invest in relationships with their outgrower farmers, which is beneficial for both business and smallholders.
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
Not provided
3 3
100%
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
Not provided
3 1
33%
2020-01-01 : 2020-12-31
INDICATOR
IDH participation in relevant landscape and or commodity platforms
Number (#) of platforms where the IDH program is playing an active role; Qualitative description about the platform/round table/coalition objective and the role played by IDH and how it can positively influence either directly or indirectly our landscape program activities.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Qualitative Qualitative
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
Not provided
3 4
100%
2018-01-01 : 2018-12-31
Actual comment
The measurement of the KPI start from 2018 with the purpose of improving the gathering of data and results of the role of IDH in commodity platforms and coalitions. 1. Malawi Tea 2020: working towards a living wage for all tea workers in Malawi, IDH has been convening this platform since 2015 as a neutral party. The platform consists of over 35 buyers, retailers, CSOs, producers and certification-body members. The neutral convening role is essential in this coalition to coordinate sustainable procurement. IDH also co-funds field-level projects to revitalize the industry and meet other program-related targets. For further reference, please see the Malawi Tea 2020 progress reports. 2. Trustea: IDH is one of the founding members of the trustea program. The program has reached a critical mass now with 46% of all Indian tea produced being trustea verified, and it is time to consolidate and maintain momentum. We are embarking on the next phase, with an evolving governance structure where the trustea code will be guided by a multi-stakeholder body – of the industry, by the industry, and for the industry. 3. Gender Empowerment Platform in Kenya: the GEP is a platform consisting of the five biggest tea producers in Kenya, as well as CSO and expert organizations on gender and GBV. IDH has convened this platform since 2016 after being asked by the biggest producing members to create an opportunity for cross-learning in the sector. IDH also co-funds projects under the platform together with three out of five producing members. 4. PPP agrochemical taskforce, Vietnam: through its engagement with the tea sector, the IDH Vietnam team is currently vice-chair of the public private partnership taskforce on agrochemicals, which is a cross-sector platform (including tea and spices). Through participation in the platform, IDH aims to further institutionalize its approach on addressing agrochemicals in Vietnam. 5. Global Tea Coalition: IDH engaged a group of key producers and packers to define and deploy a global sustainability agenda for the tea sector, in cooperation with the Ethical Tea Partnership. The expected outcome is that a global sustainability agenda is developed and that this gives direction to market transformation of the tea sector. IDH has the role of neutral convener of this platform as well as facilitator, together with ETP.
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
Not provided
3 5
100%
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
Not provided
4 5
100%
2020-01-01 : 2020-12-31
Target comment
This is a continuing KPI, so AP2020 target is the same as cumulative results 2016-2018
INDICATOR
Market share by program partners
The aggregated market share of all private sector partners in the program in terms of the annual volumes of the respective commodity produced.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
21
18 21
0%
2016-01-01 : 2016-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
21
25 30
100%
2017-01-01 : 2017-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
21
27 30
100%
2018-01-01 : 2018-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
21
30 30
100%
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
21
30
Not provided
N/A
2020-01-01 : 2020-12-31
INDICATOR
Private sector (sustainability) investments in the program
The actual realized eligible private sector investments per program (in €).
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Unit Unit
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
9400000
5000000 5935545
78%
2016-01-01 : 2016-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
9400000
2700000 6523769
42%
2017-01-01 : 2017-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
9400000
3000000 4288349
79%
2018-01-01 : 2018-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
9400000
2600000 2267310
100%
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
9400000
6800000
Not provided
N/A
2020-01-01 : 2020-12-31
INDICATOR
Uptake rate of sustainable production by program partners
The total sustainable procurement by program partners (in MT) as percentage (%) of the total procurement by program partners (in MT).
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
10 30
100%
2016-01-01 : 2016-12-31
Actual comment
Calculated based on trustea verified volume as, divided by global black tea production
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
25 41
100%
2017-01-01 : 2017-12-31
Actual comment
Calculated based on trustea verified volume as, divided by global black tea production
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
40 46
100%
2018-01-01 : 2018-12-31
Actual comment
Calculated based on trustea verified volume as, divided by global black tea production
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
45 48
100%
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
52 55.5
100%
2020-01-01 : 2020-12-31
Outcome
indicator( 3 )
Result Area 2 - Improved sector governance
INDICATOR
Changes at policy and regulatory level contributing to increased sustainability of commodity production and improved management of natural resources
The changes, interventions and enforcement in policies and regulations contributing to the sustainable production of commodities and management of natural resources.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Qualitative Qualitative
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
Not provided
2 2
100%
2016-01-01 : 2016-12-31
Actual comment
1. India - plant protection code 8.02. Malawi - gender policy (under development)
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
Not provided
4 4
100%
2017-01-01 : 2017-12-31
Actual comment
1. Kenya - Gender; 2. Vietnam - RAM; 3. India - Plant & Protection Code 9.0; 4. Malawi - Gender Equality, Sexual Harassment and Discrimination policy
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
Not provided
3 3
100%
2018-01-01 : 2018-12-31
Actual comment
1. CBA negation in the Malawian tea industry: in 2018, an 11.29% wage increase for all workers in the bargaining unit was achieved as a result of CBA negotiations between producers and workers’ representatives. This wage increase is above the current inflation rate of 8.8%, according to the Malawi Consumer Price Index, thereby giving workers the ability to meet their basic needs. In 2018, the net living wage gap closed by 25%. This means that tea workers on tea plantations in Malawi now get 40% more than the country’s minimum wage.2. Implementation of the gender policy under Malawi Tea 2020: in 2018, the policy was rolled out by the Tea Association of Malawi: gender committees and women welfare committees have been formed on all estates, and reporting mechanisms have been implemented. Estate managers have been trained on the policy and reporting. We are now building on further implementation and constant revision of the policy and reporting structures.3. Plant Protection Code 10.0: the next version (10.0) of the Plant & Protection Code (PPC) was made available by the Indian Tea Board. IDH participates through the representative of the trustea program being part of the technical group providing input on the PPC.
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
Not provided
4 4
100%
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
Not provided
3 2
66%
2020-01-01 : 2020-12-31
Target comment
Annual target of 2020 includes CBA Malawi, Plant Protection Code India, and gender policy revision Malawi
INDICATOR
Representation and commitment of key-stakeholders in multi-stakeholder processes or coalitions
The indicator score is provided by a self-assessment performed by all stakeholders that are involved in the multi-stakeholder processes associated with the program or landscape. On an annual basis, all stakeholders that are active in the processes receive a request to complete a brief electronic questionnaire. The assessment is done through a set of statements focusing on the satisfaction, representation and commitment of the multi-stakeholder processes and coalitions as part of the IDH programs.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Nominal Nominal
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
Not provided
8.4
N/A
2016-01-01 : 2016-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
Not provided
7
N/A
2017-01-01 : 2017-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
Not provided
7.2
N/A
2018-01-01 : 2018-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
Not provided
Not provided
N/A
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31
Actual comment
*Paused in 2019
INDICATOR
Satisfaction about the effectiveness of multi-stakeholder processes or coalitions associated with the program
The perceived satisfaction by the participating stakeholders (i.e. private sector, government, NGOs) of the multi-stakeholder process or coalitions in which they participate.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Nominal Nominal
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
Not provided
8.4
N/A
2016-01-01 : 2016-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
Not provided
7
N/A
2017-01-01 : 2017-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
Not provided
6.8
N/A
2018-01-01 : 2018-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
Not provided
Not provided
N/A
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31
Actual comment
*Paused in 2019
Outcome
indicator( 5 )
Result Area 3 - Improved field-level sustainability
INDICATOR
# of producers/workers/community members trained on key subjects for sustainable production, environmental and social sustainability issues
It is important to capture the following information: The number of producers or workers or community members trained; Split by gender; The number and frequency of individual training events; The topic of the training.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Unit Unit
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
193000
90000 165044
27%
2016-01-01 : 2016-12-31
Actual comment
60160 male (45%)74697 female (45%)Unknown: (10%)
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
193000
75000 272900
0%
2017-01-01 : 2017-12-31
Actual comment
Men: 93,880 (34%)
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
193000
75000 177808
12%
2018-01-01 : 2018-12-31
Actual comment
Producers: 25,127 (10,376 women and 9,676 men, 5057?) Topics include agrochemical management, GAP/trustea trainings, nutritionWorkers: 97,640 (49,937 women and 41,062 men, 6671?) Topics include gender, trustea trainings, nutritionCommunity members: 55,041 (33,405 women and 7,195 men, 14441?) Topic was raising awareness of gender
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
193000
103900 104937
98%
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31
Target comment
103,900 of which 29,700 smallholders. 50% M/F target
Actual comment
104,937 of which 43,672 smallholders. Producers (smallholders): 43,672 (16,535 men and 18,074 women, 9,063 not aggregated by gender). Workers: 61,265 (29,469 men and 28,464 women, 3,158 not aggregated by gender)
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
193000
75000 48016
100%
2020-01-01 : 2020-12-31
Target comment
75,000 of which 53,000 smallholder farmers. 50% M/F target
INDICATOR
# of smallholder producers organized/aggregated by the program
The number of smallholders organized to collectively receive services, market their products, and have an agreed governance.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Unit Unit
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
40000 30187
75%
2016-01-01 : 2016-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
20000 36740
100%
2017-01-01 : 2017-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
Not provided
25127
N/A
2018-01-01 : 2018-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
29700 43672
100%
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31
Target comment
(40% men and 60% women)
Actual comment
(16,535 men and 18,074 women, 9,063. 3,158 not aggregated by gender)
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
53000 20479
38%
2020-01-01 : 2020-12-31
Target comment
(60% men and 40% women)
INDICATOR
Adoption rate by producers/workers/ community members of improved practices
Measurement takes place 6 months after the training took place, performed by the Implementing Partner (guidance from POs is needed);Typical approaches look at 3-5 key practices that drive productivity, quality, safety or natural resource conservation or restoration practices. These should be defined specifically for each crop/program including specific criteria for adoption. Data collection could be based on a combination of on farm registration via farmer field books and observations in the field on a sample basis.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
50 66
100%
2016-01-01 : 2016-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
70 66
94%
2017-01-01 : 2017-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
0
600000
Not provided
N/A
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31
INDICATOR
Farmland area where trained practices are applied
The area where the trained skills have been applied as a result of specific activities implemented in the program.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Unit Unit
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
30530
160000 94975
49%
2016-01-01 : 2016-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
30530
25000 125786
0%
2017-01-01 : 2017-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
30530
Not provided
136737
N/A
2018-01-01 : 2018-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
30530
125000 66785
38%
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
30530
301885 257965
83%
2020-01-01 : 2020-12-31
INDICATOR
Volume of sustainably produced production
The amount of sustainable produced production (in Metric Tons) as the result of the training or services delivered by the program.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Unit Unit
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
220000
200000 144000
100%
2016-01-01 : 2016-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
220000
50000 148000
42%
2017-01-01 : 2017-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
220000
500000 608000
100%
2018-01-01 : 2018-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
220000
600000 663110
100%
2019-01-01 : 2019-12-31
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2016
220000
690000 694091
100%
2020-01-01 : 2020-12-31
General Enquiries
IDH, the Sustainable Trade Initiative
Jordy van Honk
Program Director Tea