ACTIVITY TITLE
Mali Programme
Reported by
VNG International NL-KVK-27195046 Other Public Sector
ACTIVITY SCOPE COLLABORATION TYPE AID TYPE FINANCE TYPE FLOW TYPE TIED STATUS HIERARCHY
Bilateral 1
Project-type interventions C01
Standard grant 110 ODA 10 Untied 2
DOCUMENTS ( 29 )
A boost to Integrated and Sustainable Development in the Sankarani Basin APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page AMM in collaboration with VNG International: Training on COVID-19 response APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page AMM: Supporting local authorities across Mali with COVID-19 response APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page An Integrated and Sustainable Development Plan for the Sankarani Basin APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Bringing together citizens and government in one common goal APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Female Leadership APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Gender and conflict sensitivity training: making IWRM inclusive APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Grant Update APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Grant Update: Restauration of Dam leads to better water resources for all! APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Grants for integrated and inclusive water governance APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page IDEAL Mali 1st Advisory Committee: Discussing ‘hot’ topics in a hot environment APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Inclusive Integrated Water Resource Management APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Involving marginalized groups in planning for local development in Mali APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Mobilising Malian youth as agents of change APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page New energy in Mali APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Q1 2017: Launch of IDEAL Mali prioritises IWRM and gender APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Q2 2017: Mali inception phase studies appraise needs of pilot communes and LGA APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Q3 2017: IDEAL Mali pilot communes gathered for the first time in Bamako APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Regional Cooperation: An Integrated and Sustainable Development Plan for the Sankarani Basin APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Resource Mobilisation APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Sand and gravel miners unite against illegal practices APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page The IDEAL Mali team is expanding! APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Thirty-two Malians visit Burkina Faso for knowledge exchange APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page VNG International and World Waternet sign MoU APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page VNG International signs MoU with Join for Water APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Video update: what does IDEAL do in Mali? APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Visit to the municipalities: witnessing the need of an improved IWRM governance APPLICATION/HTTP EN Activity web page Results of 2019: AMM in collaboration with VNG International (FR) APPLICATION/HTTP FR Activity web page Project photo IMAGE/JPEG Activity web page
Planned start date 2017-01-01
Planned end date 2021-12-31
Actual end date 2021-12-31
activity status: Finalisation
Physical activity is complete or the final disbursement has been made, but the activity remains open pending financial sign off or M&E
WHO'S INVOLVED ( 2 )
PARTICIPATING ORG REFERENCE ROLE TYPE
VNG International
Funding Other Public Sector
VNG International
Implementing Other Public Sector
General
Inclusive Decisions At Local level (IDEAL)
General
The IDEAL Mali Programme will work towards achieving the following outputs: * Output 1.1: The capacity of municipalities’ elected officials and permanent staff to manage local water resources and deliver water-related services is improved. * Output 1.2: The technical capabilities of technical staff (including women) working with/in municipal water commissions have improved. * Output 1.3: The capability of the municipality to deliver water services that are more responsive towards the needs of their citizens, specifically women, has improved. * Output 2.1: Malian decision-making bodies (municipalities’ water commissions) are functioning to create public space for consultation and deliberation at the local level on management of water resources in link with the CLE (local water committees). * Output 2.2: Malian decision-making bodies (municipalities’ water commissions) manage participatory decision-making processes and take into account input provided by stakeholders. * Output 2.3: The leadership capacities of female decision-makers within municipalities have improved. * Output 3.1: Coordination mechanisms between national and decentralized (regional and municipal) level of government, including the GIRE programmes and the Ministry of Water, are in place and have capacity to improve integrated water resource management (IWRM) at the national level. * Output 3.2: AMM is better able to provide needs-based services to its members and implement its Strategic Plan 2017-2022. * Output 3.3: AMM, in coordination with other LGAs, improved its capability to influence national policies in favour of decentralized and gender-sensitive (water) management. * Output 3.4: AMM improved the capacity of the technical working commissions in order to better lobby their position towards national government. * Output 3.5: AMM is capable of applying a gender focus in implementing its Strategic Plan 2017 – 2022.
General
The IDEAL Mali programme focuses on effective and responsive public service delivery and inclusive decision-making processes at the local level by 5 Malian municipalities in regard to integrated water resource management.
General
The Malian decentralisation process started in 1999 and the first wave of decentralisation in Mali is considered to have lasted until 2004 under the motto “décentralisation immédiate et intégrale”. In principle, a functioning decentralisation in Mali potentially could provide with an appropriate service delivery, collaborative management of public infrastructures and resources and with decision-making of proximity (local democracy), as well as accountability mechanisms (citizens’ control). More recently, decentralisation has been endorsed as a sustainable way out of the crisis in Mali (Algiers agreement, 2015), through which both the central government and the international community once more recognise the enormous potential of decentralised governance in Mali, in spite of the mixed results of the decentralisation after 16 years. Nevertheless, Malian municipalities still lack the financial and technical resources to deliver appropriate services to the population. The transfer of competencies and resources from central to local governments is lagging behind, as well as the latter’s performance in effectively delivering services and bringing good management and governance to the citizens. IDEAL Mali (2017-2021) will essentially be a capacity development programme aimed at supporting Malian municipalities in strengthening public service delivery to citizens, particularly in the area of integrated water resource management (IWRM/GIRE), as a result of inclusive, conflict- and gender-sensitive decision-making processes, conducive national policies and legislation, as well as by enhancing participation of women in leadership thereby increasing capacity to prevent and manage conflicts. One of the main results of continued support of VNG International to AMM through LGCP (2012-2016) is the newly-developed Strategic Plan of the Association for 2016-2020. In this document, AMM acknowledges that local government can only gain legitimacy vis-à-vis their citizens by showing results in service delivery in their sectors of competence and has identified areas where Malian municipalities need most support in the coming years.
Objectives
The impact of the overall IDEAL programme is: The stronger social contract between local governments and citizens has enhanced local governments' capacity to cope with fragility risks. The outcomes of the IDEAL Mali programme are: * Outcome 1: IWRM service delivery by Malian municipalities is more effective and responsive, particularly to the needs of women and youth. * Outcome 2: In Mali, decision-making processes on integrated water resource management at the local level are more participatory and inclusive. * Outcome 3: AMM has effectively lobbied for the creation or adjustment of water policies and legislation at national level in coordination with the other existing LGAs in Mali. Also, AMM effectively improved the service delivery towards their members.
Target Groups
The programme primarily targets pilot communes and the Local Government Association (AMM) as beneficiaries. The final selection of pilot communes will be made during the inception phase.
policy marker( 2 )
CODELIST SIGNIFICANCE VOCABULARY DESCRIPTION
Gender Equality significant objective OECD DAC CRS Significant (secondary) policy objectives are those which, although important, were not the prime motivation for undertaking the activity.
Participatory Development/Good Governance principal objective OECD DAC CRS Principal (primary) policy objectives are those which can be identified as being fundamental in the design and impact of the activity and which are an explicit objective of the activity. They may be selected by answering the question "Would the activity have been undertaken without this objective?"
recipient country ( 1 )
MaliML
100
LOCATION ( 1 )
NAME DESCRIPTION POSITION CLASS REACH EXACTNESS
12.639232 -8.002889
sector ( 1 )
OECD DAC CRS 5 digit1( 1 )
The sector reported corresponds to an OECD DAC CRS 5-digit purpose code http://reference.iatistandard.org/codelists/Sector/
Decentralisation and support to subnational government15112
100
GLOSSARY
Decentralisation and support to subnational governmentDecentralisation processes (including political, administrative and fiscal dimensions); intergovernmental relations and federalism; strengthening departments of regional and local government, regional and local authorities and their national associations. (Use specific sector codes for decentralisation of sector management and services.)
Financial Overview
Incoming Funds ( 3 )
Expenditure ( 3 )
Budget ( 5 )
Incoming Funds
Expenditure
Budget
Budget ( 5 )
START END TYPE STATUS VALUE
2017-01-01 2017-12-31 419,607
EUR
2018-01-01 2018-12-31 429,607
EUR
2019-01-01 2019-12-31 400,000
EUR
2020-01-01 2020-12-31 400,000
EUR
2021-01-01 2021-12-31 400,000
EUR
Budget
Transactions ( 6 )
Incoming Funds ( 3 )
DATE DESCRIPTION PROVIDER RECEIVER VALUE
2017-12-31
VNG International
Other Public Sector
VNG International
Other Public Sector
297,435
EUR
2018-12-31
VNG International
Other Public Sector
VNG International
Other Public Sector
360,854
EUR
2019-01-01
VNG International
Other Public Sector
VNG International
Other Public Sector
415,487
EUR
Incoming Funds
Expenditure ( 3 )
DATE DESCRIPTION PROVIDER RECEIVER VALUE
2017-12-31
VNG International
Other Public Sector
VNG International
Other Public Sector
297,435
EUR
2018-12-31
VNG International
Other Public Sector
VNG International
Other Public Sector
360,854
EUR
2019-01-01
VNG International
Other Public Sector
VNG International
Other Public Sector
415,487
EUR
Expenditure
result( 4 )
outcome( 3 )
impact( 1 )
GLOSSARY
OutcomeResults of the activity that produce an effect on the overall communities or issues you serve. For example lower rate of infection after a vaccination programme.
ImpactThe long term effects of the outcomes, that lead to larger, over arching results, such as improved life-expectancy.
Outcome
indicator( 5 )
Decision-making processes at the local level in key policy areas are more inclusive and participatory (Input legitimacy).
Input legitimacy is the part of the institutions’ legitimacy, which is based on their capacity to both accommodate the active participation of citizens’ throughout the decision-making process (participation) and to ensure adequate representation of all interests in society at various levels of governance in a fair and equal manner (inclusiveness).
INDICATOR
Inclusiveness (Objective) Index
This index is made up of 3 indicators measured through focus group discussions with local government representatives and stakeholders: 1. The local government policies in the policy area are informed by stakeholders 2. There is transparency in the selection of stakeholders in participatory mechanisms in the policy area 3. The local government decisions in the policy area reflects women’s | youth needs The Inclusivity (objective) index shows the average score attributed by an analyst across these three indicators on a scale from 0 to 100, based on whether these elements are embedded and sustainable (75-100%), existent and positive but with room for improvement (50-75%), existent but insufficient (25-50%), or inexistent, very poor, with a negative impact (0-25%).
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2017
27
44 53.33
100%
2017-07-01 : 2021-12-31
INDICATOR
Inclusiveness (Perception) Index
This index is made up of 4 indicators measured through a citizen survey: 1. The local government involves relevant people/groups/institutions/organisations in decisions for the policy area 2. Citizens feel they can disagree on topics related to policy area with the leaders or other individuals in public 3. The local government treats the views and opinions of different groups equally on the policy area 4. Women (citizens) take active part in the decision making process on policy area | Youth (citizens) take active part in the decision making process on policy area The Inclusivity (perception) index shows the average percentage of respondents who answered ‘Strongly agree’, ‘Agree’, or ‘Yes' across these five indicators, for the specific policy area selected in each country programme.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2017
33
42 42.55
100%
2017-07-01 : 2021-12-31
INDICATOR
Input legitimacy index
The input legitimacy index combines the four indexes under Outcome 2 measuring participation and inclusiveness through perception and objective indicators. The index is scored on a range of 0 (very poor) to 100 (very good).
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2017
36
45 50.99
100%
2017-07-01 : 2021-12-31
INDICATOR
Participation (Objective) Index
This index is made up of 3 indicators measured through focus group discussions with local government representatives and stakeholders: 1. Citizens are involved in participatory activities organised by the local government as inputs for policy making in the policy area 2. The participatory activities organised for the policy making process by the local government in the policy area are timely and regular 3. Information generated at the local government in the policy area is shared regularly with citizens The participation (objective) index shows the average score attributed by an analyst across these three indicators on a scale from 0 to 100, based on whether these elements are embedded and sustainable (75-100%), existent and positive but with room for improvement (50-75%), existent but insufficient (25-50%), or inexistent, very poor, with a negative impact (0-25%).
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2017
47
48 77.78
100%
2017-07-01 : 2021-12-31
INDICATOR
Participation (Perception) Index
This index is made up of 4 indicators measured through a citizen survey: 1. The local government gets the inputs of citizens when making decisions on policies related to policy area 2. Every group (young, women, sick, elderly, religion, ethnicity) in the society participates in decision making processes related to policy area 3. Citizens know how they can participate in decisions of the local governments (in policy area) 4. Citizens feel their opinion is important to the local government (in policy area) The participation (perception) index shows the average percentage of respondents who answered ‘Strongly agree’, ‘Agree’, or ‘Yes' across these four indicators, for the specific policy area selected in each country programme.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2017
42
47 44.75
55%
2017-07-01 : 2021-12-31
Outcome
indicator( 5 )
Service delivery by local governments in key policy areas is more responsive and effective (Output legitimacy).
Output legitimacy is the part of the institution’s legitimacy that is constructed as a result of their perceived and observable achievements. By responsiveness we understand the capacity to address (identifiable) needs/demands by citizens and respond to existing (measurable) challenges in a community. By effectiveness we understand the degree to which policy objectives are achieved and the extent to which targeted problems are solved through concrete interventions of the local governments.
INDICATOR
Effectiveness (Objective) Index
This index is made up of 2 indicators measured through focus group discussions with local government representatives and stakeholders: 1. The services delivered by the local government solve the key issues in the policy area. 2. Roles of actors involved in policy implementation (incl. Services) are clearly defined in the policy area. The effectiveness (objective) index shows the average score attributed by an analyst across these two indicators on a scale from 0 to 100, based on whether these elements are embedded and sustainable (75-100%), existent and positive but with room for improvement (50-75%), existent but insufficient (25-50%), or inexistent, very poor, with a negative impact (0-25%).
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2017
53
49 50.0
75%
2017-07-01 : 2021-12-31
INDICATOR
Effectiveness (perception) Index
This index is made up of 4 indicators measured through a citizen survey: 1. The local government has competent people to implement its strategy in the policy area. 2. The local government improves women's | young people’s lives in the policy area. 3. The local government is taking action to tackle factors which hinder its performance in the policy area. 4. Citizens are satisfied with the services related to policy area The effectiveness (perception) index shows the average percentage of respondents who answered ‘Strongly agree’, ‘Agree’, or ‘Yes' across these four indicators, for the specific policy area selected in each country programme.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2017
29
36 26.85
0%
2017-07-01 : 2021-12-31
INDICATOR
Output legitimacy index
The output legitimacy index combines the four indexes under Outcome 1 measuring responsiveness and effectiveness through perception and objective indicators. The index is scored on a range of 0 (very poor) to 100 (very good).
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2017
42
46 44.26
56%
2017-07-01 : 2021-12-31
INDICATOR
Responsiveness (objective) Index
This index is made up of 2 indicators measured through focus group discussions with local government representatives and stakeholders: 1. Policies clearly target citizens' concerns (match with citizens answers to answer 1 on key priorities in policy area during analysis) 2. The local government addresses the needs of various groups in the community related to service delivery in the policy area. The Responsiveness (objective) index shows the average score attributed by an analyst across these two indicators on a scale from 0 to 100, based on whether these elements are embedded and sustainable (75-100%), existent and positive but with room for improvement (50-75%), existent but insufficient (25-50%), or inexistent, very poor, with a negative impact (0-25%).
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2017
47
41 83.33
0%
2017-07-01 : 2021-12-31
INDICATOR
Responsiveness (perception) index
This index is made up of 4 indicators measured through a citizen survey: 1. The local government does enough to address top challenges in the community in the policy area 2. The local political leaders understand the needs of the local community in the policy area 3. The policies of the local government address the most urgent needs of women | youth in the policy area 4. Citizens can identify one action of the local government to answer their needs in the policy area The responsiveness (perception) index shows the average percentage of respondents who answered ‘Strongly agree’, ‘Agree’, or ‘Yes' across these four indicators, for the specific policy area selected in each country programme.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2017
49
60 44.1
0%
2017-07-01 : 2021-12-31
Outcome
indicator( 5 )
The policy and institutional environments of local governments has improved (Enabling Environment).
Enabling environment is a set of interrelated conditions that impact on the capacity of local governments to engage in development processes in a sustained and effective manner. By policy environment we refer to the set of legal, administrative and procedural frameworks that affect the capacity of the local governments to drive development process and change. By institutional environment we refer to the set of inter-institutional relations that determine the capacities of the local governments to carry out their functions.
INDICATOR
Enabling environment index
The enabling environment index combines the four indexes under Outcome 3 measuring the policy and institutional environment of local governments through perception and objective indicators. The index is scored on a range of 0 (very poor) to 100 (very good).
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2017
22
29 46.15
100%
2017-07-01 : 2021-12-31
INDICATOR
Institutional Environment (objective) Index
This index is made up of 3 indicators measured through focus group discussions with local government representatives and stakeholders: 1. Policy coordination mechanisms between stakeholders in the policy area are regularly implemented 2. The LG remunerates the local government association for its services in the policy area 3. The local government association provides support to LGs to provide gender sensitive policies and related services in the policy area The Institutional Environment (objective) index shows the average score attributed by an analyst across these three indicators on a scale from 0 to 100, based on whether these elements are embedded and sustainable (75-100%), existent and positive but with room for improvement (50-75%), existent but insufficient (25-50%), or inexistent, very poor, with a negative impact (0-25%).
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2017
9
18 26.67
100%
2017-07-01 : 2021-12-31
INDICATOR
Institutional Environment (perception) Index
This index is made up of 4 indicators measured through a survey with political actors and LG stakeholders. 1. The local government association participates in multi-stakeholders activities relevant to policy area 2. There is good coordination between stakeholders when it comes to improving the quality of service delivery in policy area 3. The local government is aware of the role of the local government association and the services it provides related to the policy area. 4. The local government association provides high quality services to its members in policy area. The Institutional Environment (perception) index shows the average percentage of respondents who answered ‘Strongly agree’, ‘Agree’, or ‘Yes' across these four indicators, for the specific policy area selected in each country programme.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2017
28
34 56.25
100%
2017-07-01 : 2021-12-31
INDICATOR
Policy Environment (objective) Index
This index is made up of 3 indicators measured through focus group discussions with local government representatives and stakeholders: 1. Key documents relevant for service delivery in the policy area are published and circulated among stakeholders 2. Legislation and policies are informed by national or international good practices in the policy area 3. The advocacy of the local government association (or the LG) is reflected in national policy initiatives in the policy area The Policy Environment (objective) index shows the average score attributed by an analyst across these three indicators on a scale from 0 to 100, based on whether these elements are embedded and sustainable (75-100%), existent and positive but with room for improvement (50-75%), existent but insufficient (25-50%), or inexistent, very poor, with a negative impact (0-25%).
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2017
29
28 44.44
0%
2017-07-01 : 2021-12-31
INDICATOR
Policy Environment (perception) Index
This index is made up of 4 indicators measured through a survey with political actors and LG stakeholders: 1. The legal framework outlining the roles and responsibilities of the local government is clear for the policy area 2. The national policy making procedures for policy area allows participation of the local government and relevant stakeholders 3. The local government needs are reflected in national policy documents related to policy area 4. Women’s needs are integrated in the national policies in policy area | Youth’s needs are integrated in the national policies in policy area. The policy environment (perception) index shows the average percentage of respondents who answered ‘Strongly agree’, ‘Agree’, or ‘Yes' across these four indicators, for the specific policy area selected in each country programme.
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2017
46
56 91.25
100%
2017-07-01 : 2021-12-31
Impact
indicator( 1 )
The stronger social contract between local governments and citizens has enhanced local governments' capacity to cope with fragility risks.
The contract between local governments and citizens is the mechanism by which everyone in a political community, either explicitly or tacitly, consents to state authority, thereby limiting some of her freedoms, in exchange for the state’s protection of their universal human rights and security and for the adequate provision of public goods and services.
INDICATOR
Aggregated quality of the social contract index
The program impact is measured by the social contract index, which combines the three level II outcome indices: output legitimacy index, input legitimacy index and enabling environment index. The social contract index is scored on a range of 0 (very poor) to 100 (very good).
FACET BASELINE TARGET ACTUAL % PERIOD
Percentage Percentage
No dimension has been provided
No location has been provided
2017
35
42 47.23
100%
2017-07-01 : 2021-12-31
Project Management
VNG International
Robert Meerman
Senior Project Manager
Nassaulaan 12 2514 JS The Hague The Netherlands
other identifier( 1 )
REFERENCE IDENTIFIER OWNER ORG IDENTIFIER TYPE DESCRIPTION
5675 NL-KVK-27327087
Akvo Foundation
Other Organisation Identifier
CODE B9
No description provided